Moving beyond screening to the first equipment-based estimate: Class 4 uses your equipment list and proven factoring methods to produce a project cost within ±30–50%. Here's exactly how it works.
How Kpex implements Class 4 following AACE 18R-97
Kpex 2G guides the cost engineer through every step of the Class 4 workflow — from scope input to indexed, location-adjusted output — enforcing the AACE recommended methodology at each stage. The platform validates inputs, applies the correct indices automatically, and generates a documented Basis of Estimate aligned with AACE 18R-97.
A Class 4 Study Estimate is the first estimate built from an actual equipment list. Produced when engineering is approximately 1–15% complete (typically at the end of a Conceptual Study or early Pre-FEED), it brings cost accuracy into the −30% to +50% range.
Where Class 5 asks "Is this worth doing?", Class 4 asks "How much will the major systems cost, and what is the project structure?" It is the estimate used to decide between process route alternatives, to size contingency reserves, and to justify proceeding to FEED.
The dominant technique for Class 4 estimation is the equipment-factor method, most commonly applied using Lang Factors (introduced by Herbert Lang in 1948 and refined by Hand, Baumann, and others).
The principle: Total Installed Cost (TIC) is a predictable multiple of Purchased Equipment Cost (PEC), because the ratio of civil, structural, piping, electrical, instrumentation, insulation, painting, and indirect costs to equipment cost is relatively stable within a given plant type.
| Plant Type | Lang Factor | Typical Industries |
|---|---|---|
| Fluid processing | 3.1× | Refineries, gas processing, LNG |
| Mixed fluid-solid | 3.6× | Petrochemicals, specialty chemicals |
| Solid processing | 4.7× | Mining, mineral processing, fertilisers |
Organise your estimate using a Work Breakdown Structure. At Class 4 level, areas are typically process areas or systems (e.g., Area 100 — Feed Pre-treatment, Area 200 — Reaction, Area 300 — Separation). Kpex provides a WBS builder integrated directly into the equipment list form.
For each WBS area, list the major pieces of equipment. Kpex supports three equipment pricing sources:
For each item, record: description, equipment type/family (e.g., A.1.1 — Compressor, A.1.3 — Heat Exchanger), quantity, and unit purchased cost. Module A lookups include weight (tonnes) and erection manhours — data that feeds directly into Class 3/2 estimates later.
Multiply the total purchased equipment cost by the appropriate Lang Factor for your plant type. This gives the Direct Field Cost (DC), which covers all field-installed materials and labour (civil, structural, piping, electrical, instrumentation, insulation).
Add project indirect costs as a percentage of DC or as fixed amounts:
The Lang Factor and equipment costs are typically on a USGC basis. Apply Z.4 LFI for your project country and Z.5 CAI to escalate from the cost basis year to the project execution year.
Record all assumptions: equipment pricing source, Lang factor selected and rationale, cost basis date, CEPCI reference, LFI factor applied, contingency methodology, and scope exclusions.
Kpex stores each equipment item relationally, with the following data captured per item:
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| WBS Area | Process area or system (code + name) |
| Description | Equipment tag and service name |
| Equipment Type | AACE/Kpex family code (e.g., A.1.1, A.1.3) |
| Source | OEM / Quotation / Kpex Module A |
| Quantity & Unit Cost | Purchased cost in project currency |
| Weight (te) | Equipment weight from Module A lookup |
| Manhours | Erection manhours from Module A |
| Attachments | Vendor quotation PDFs / datasheet files |